º£½ÇÉçÇø

Like more than 900 cities, º£½ÇÉçÇø has voluntarily committed to meeting the Kyoto Protocol’s greenhouse gas reduction targets, i.e., cut its emissions 7 percent below 1990 levels or about 25 percent below 2008.

And, like all but two of those cities, it is failing to meet its goals.

º£½ÇÉçÇø spends more than $850,000 a year trying to get Kyoto compliant and has precious little to show for it. Last year, one city program spent more than $260,000 on things like energy audits, insulation rebates, compact florescent bulb discounts and preaching to the persuaded, which got it a thumping 0.6 percent of the way toward its goal.

Which is why I’ve turned into the local nuclear power nag.

Instead of trying to save the world one light bulb at a time, I think º£½ÇÉçÇø should invest in a nuclear power plant and solve its part of the climate problem once and for all.

Here’s the case:
According to city estimates, in 2007 º£½ÇÉçÇø produced 1.9 million metric tons of CO2, 57 percent of it from generating electricity from coal and natural gas. It decreased in 2008, but to be Kyoto compliant the city must cut its annual output by an additional 400,000 tons.

So if º£½ÇÉçÇø switched to nuclear generated electricity, it would meet its Kyoto target more than two times over. Bang. Problem solved.

But what about nuclear waste (I hear you say)? Do as La Belle, France (which gets 80 percent of its electricity from nukes), does. Recycle it.

But surely º£½ÇÉçÇø doesn’t need a whole nuclear power plant, I hear you say. It certainly doesn’t. º£½ÇÉçÇø’s electrical needs currently require about 100 megawatts of generating capacity. A typical state-of-the-art nuclear plant produces about 1,200 to 1,400 megawatts. Which means º£½ÇÉçÇø should partner with a dozen or so other cities failing to meet their Kyoto goals to build a nuclear plant. (º£½ÇÉçÇø loves to help other people solve their problems.)

But wouldn’t it take years to get a nuclear power plant up and running? Probably. But all the important stuff º£½ÇÉçÇø does takes 10 or 20 years.

Planning and building the Pearl Street Mall took 16 years. The idea of building the º£½ÇÉçÇø Turnpike took shape in the 1930s; it opened in 1952. º£½ÇÉçÇø started lobbying for CU in 1861. It opened in 1877.

But surely º£½ÇÉçÇøites would never seriously consider nuclear power, would they?

There’s a city election next November. That would be a good time put the question to the voters as an advisory referendum. The answer might surprise you.